Dave hickey essay

Yeah, then I think about it. I still have no ideas what all those holes are about in Lee’s work. If I got a job I would sit around and think about it until I knew. But I thought they were just majestic. And those works alone – along with Lynda Benglis ’s – should improve the status of the quality of art in LA by themselves. I can remember the first time I saw one of those [Benglis works] in a gallery in Dallas. I just thought, “Yeah! All right. I can worry about that forever.” With Lynda and with Lee you’re impressed by the sort of investment. Exactly how much time and trouble and money it took to put it all together. Also, Lee figured out how to do tragic abjection in art, before anyone else. She just did it right out of the box, you know? I would like one but it would it would make me very sad probably.

Dave Hickey tackled Land art with characteristic vigor in an essay for .'s September-October 1971 issue. With occasional detours into country music and The Wizard of Oz, he speculated on what seeing Land art as a new form of landscape, and on what this reconfiguration of "ground" would mean the status of the art object. Along the way he slips in a provocative thesis opposing Pop art and Land art as the favored forms of two art-world ecosystems that were rapidly expanding in the sixties and seventies: galleries and magazines. …

Dave hickey essay

dave hickey essay


dave hickey essaydave hickey essaydave hickey essaydave hickey essay